Legal Analysis: Russia's Right To Be Forgotten

By -

Legal Analysis: Russia's Right To Be Forgotten


image

In August 2015, ARTICLE 19 analysed the so-called “Right To Be Forgotten” Bill of the Russian Federation (‘the Bill’), which was signed into law in July 2015 and will come into force on 1 January 2016.
When introducing the Bill, Russian lawmakers referred to the 2014 ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Google Spain case, arguing that Russian citizens should also enjoy a “right to be forgotten.” The Bill gives Russian citizens the right to request that search engines remove links about them that are in violation of Russian law, inaccurate, out of date, or irrelevant because of subsequent events or actions taken by the citizens.
In this legal analysis, ARTICLE 19 examines the compatibility of the Bill with international standards on freedom of expression. We find that, while the Bill broadly seeks to replicate the more limited right that was recognised by the CJEU in the Google Spain case, it fails to provide the crucial safeguards for the protection of the right to freedom of expression that the CJEU had identified. In particular, Russian lawmakers have failed to carve out limitations on “right to be forgotten” when the personal information at issue is in the public interest and/or concerns public figures.
Important procedural safeguards are also missing, including the right of linked-to sites to be notified that a “right to be forgotten” request has been made in respect of their content and a requirement that search engines publish transparency reports containing sufficiently detailed information about the nature, volume and outcome of “right to be forgotten” requests. Moreover, search engines are required by the Bill to take action in relation to the Internet, i.e. all domain names, rather than .ru domains names.
my article calls on the Russian Government to urgently review the Bill and ensure that its provisions comply with international human rights standards on freedom of expression.

 Key Recommendations:

  • The new Article 110 of Federal Law no. 149-FZ On Information, Information Technologies and Data Protection included in the Bill should be entitled “right to request the delisting of search results on the basis of a person’s name;”
  • The applicability of the Bill should be subject to the operator having a branch or subsidiary established in the Russian Federation;
  • The material effect of a successful “right to be forgotten” request should be limited to de-listing search results generated on the basis of a search for a person’s name;
  • Any “right to be forgotten” provision should, at the very least:
    • contain an overarching presumption that information already legitimately in the public domain should remain in the public domain save where it has demonstrably caused serious harm to the person concerned;
    • a broad exception for personal information in the public interest and personal information concerning public figures.
  • More generally, any law granting a “right to be forgotten” should provide for balancing exercise with the right to freedom of expression, and if appropriate, set out a non-exhaustive list of indicative criteria to be taken into account when carrying out that balancing exercise.
  • The scope of a successful “right to be forgotten” request should be strictly limited to .ru domains.
  • The Bill should provide a right for linked-to sites to be notified and at the very least give them an opportunity to intervene in cases being challenged by search engines before the courts.
  • The Bill should require that search engines publish sufficiently detailed information about the nature, volume, and outcome of de-listing requests. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feedback in Three Steps

By -
© 2003, Coert Visser As a manager you have just led a meeting. John brought forward a proposal to implement a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. He did this convincingly and enthusiastically but seemed to leave very little room for his colleagues Michael and Peter to respond. You want to talk to John about this...but how? Feedback is essential Giving and getting feedback is essential. The fact is, no matter how hard we try, we don’t always automatically perform excellent. We need information from others to know what is expected from us, how others perceive us, what we do well and what we should do better. Sometimes others have more expertise or skills, they look at your behavior from a different angle, and they may have access to different information. When feedback functions well in an organization, people are interested in signals about the effects of their behavior and they constructively correct each other. Fantastic! But now the less rosy daily practice.….. Feedback ca...
Read more

Esoteric Aspects of Edgar Cayce's Life

By -
Image
Gladys Davis, Hugh Lynn Cayce (right) and Harmon Hartzell Bro were among the members of this A Search for God study group meeting at A.R.E. Headquarters at Lake Holly in 1950.  This photo is from Edgar Cayce's Photographic Legacy (1978) compiled by David M. Leary. Some of Edgar Cayce's psychic (channeled) readings diagnosed and prescribed for people's physical ailments and disturbances.  These were described by Thomas Sugrue in There Is A River (1942) as presenting "cases, hundreds and hundreds of them, wherein the treatments have been faithfully followed, and the predicted results have been achieved." When information that was sought wasn't successfully forthcoming (such as locations for lost treasure or oil wells), Cayce and his associates were baffled.  These circumstances are chronicled in the book The Outer Limits of Edgar Cayce's Power (1971) by Edgar's sons Edgar Evans Cayce and Hugh Lynn Cayce.  One chapter, "Readings for...
Read more

Case Profile: Edgar Cayce

By -
Image
Edgar Cayce (1877-1945) became known as an American mystic and "psychic diagnostician" healer following hypnotic sessions where he would go into a trance and his body would be used as a channel.   The communicating Intelligence would speak in plurality, usually beginning a 'reading' with a statement such as "We have the body . . ." and finishing upon saying "We are through for the present."  I first learned about Cayce through reading Jess Stearn's biographies Edgar Cayce — The Sleeping Prophet (1967) and A Prophet in His Own Country — The Story of the Young Edgar Cayce (1974).  The first biography to be written about Cayce is There Is a River: The Story of Edgar Cayce (1943) by Thomas Sugrue, whose book heightened public understanding about Cayce during the final years of his life.  Sidney Kirkpatrick's Edgar Cayce: An American Prophet was published in 2000. Since 2005, I've occasionally studied portions of the extant 14,306 Cayce...
Read more